Intercompany eliminations in consolidated accounts, explained
Last updated 21 July 2026
What intercompany transactions are, why they must be eliminated on consolidation, and how to post elimination journals for loans, sales and investments.
When you consolidate a group, you present it as if it were a single entity. That means any transaction between members of the group has to be removed — otherwise the consolidated accounts would double-count internal activity and overstate the group's real position. Removing those transactions is called elimination, and it is the step that separates a genuine consolidation from a simple sum of ledgers.
What counts as an intercompany transaction?
An intercompany transaction is any dealing between two entities inside the same group. From the group's point of view, no value has left or entered — money has simply moved from one pocket to another. Common examples include:
- Intercompany loans — a receivable in one entity and a matching payable in another.
- Internal sales and purchases — revenue in one member, cost in another, for goods or services never sold outside the group.
- Dividends and distributions paid from one group member to another.
- Investment in a subsidiary — the parent's investment against the subsidiary's equity.
- Management fees and recharges between related entities.
Why they must be eliminated
If an intercompany loan stayed in the consolidated balance sheet, the group would show both a receivable and a payable that net to nothing in reality — inflating both assets and liabilities. Leave internal sales in and consolidated revenue looks larger than the group actually earned from customers. Eliminations strip this out so the statements reflect only the group's dealings with the outside world.
How to post an elimination journal
In Report Craft, eliminations are handled with consolidation adjustment journals. Each journal has a debit account and a credit account and is applied on top of the consolidated figures. To eliminate an intercompany loan, for example, you debit the intercompany payable and credit the intercompany receivable so the two cancel out across the group.
Adjustments can stay local to Report Craft — layered onto the consolidated report without touching the underlying ledgers — or, for firms that post back, be pushed to QuickBooks or Xero. Local-only adjustments are the norm for consolidation, because the elimination belongs to the group view rather than to any single entity's books.
A quick checklist
- List every account that represents an internal balance before you start.
- Match each intercompany receivable to its corresponding payable.
- Post one elimination journal per intercompany relationship — it keeps the audit trail clear.
- Confirm the consolidated trial balance still balances after the eliminations.
Eliminations are one part of the wider workflow in our guide on consolidating across QuickBooks and Xero.
Consolidate your clients with Report Craft
Connect QuickBooks and Xero ledgers and generate consolidated financial statements in minutes.
Related guides
How to consolidate financial statements across QuickBooks and Xero
Combine client ledgers from both accounting packages into one group and produce a single set of consolidated financial statements.
Consolidating a trust group: a practical guide for accountants
Trust groups add distributions and appropriations to the mix — here's how to consolidate them cleanly.
How to consolidate multiple Xero organisations (2026 guide)
Xero can't consolidate organisations on its own — here's how to produce group accounts from multiple Xero files.
How to consolidate multiple QuickBooks Online companies
Combine several QuickBooks Online company files into one consolidated set of group financial statements.
Consolidated reporting at EOFY for Australian groups
An EOFY checklist for consolidating Australian multi-entity groups across Xero and QuickBooks.
Choosing consolidation software: how to compare the options
What to look for when comparing consolidation reporting tools for Xero and QuickBooks — and how Report Craft's per-ledger pricing compares.